PT -symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body physics—a methodological perspective

Abstract

Abstract We review the methodology to theoretically treat parity-time- ( P T -) symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems. They are realized as open quantum systems with P T symmetry and couplings to the environment which are compatible. P T -symmetric non-Hermitian quantum systems show a variety of fascinating properties which single them out among generic open systems. The study of the latter has a long history in quantum theory. These studies are based on the Hermiticity of the combined system-reservoir setup and were developed by the atomic, molecular, and optical physics as well as the condensed matter physics communities. The interest of the mathematical physics community in P T -symmetric, non-Hermitian systems led to a new perspective and the development of the elegant mathematical formalisms of P T -symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics, which do not make any reference to the environment. In the mathematical physics research, the focus is mainly on the remarkable spectral properties of the Hamiltonians and the characteristics of the corresponding single-particle eigenstates. Despite being non-Hermitian, the Hamiltonians can show parameter regimes, in which all eigenvalues are real. To investigate emergent quantum many-body phenomena in condensed matter physics and to make contact to experiments one, however, needs to study expectation values of observables and correlation functions. One furthermore, has to investigate statistical ensembles and not only eigenstates. The adoption of the concepts of P T -symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics by parts of the condensed matter community led to a controversial status of the methodology. There is no consensus on fundamental issues, such as, what a proper observable is, how expectation values are supposed to be computed, and what adequate equilibrium statistical ensembles and their corresponding density matrices are. With the technological progress in engineering and controlling open quantum many-body systems it is high time to reconcile the Hermitian with the P T -symmetric and biorthogonal perspectives. We comprehensively review the different approaches, including the overreaching idea of pseudo-Hermiticity. To motivate the Hermitian perspective, which we propagate here, we mainly focus on the ancilla approach. It allows to embed a non-Hermitian system into a larger, Hermitian one. In contrast to other techniques, e.g. master equations, it does not rely on any approximations. We discuss the peculiarities of P T -symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. In these, what is considered to be an observable depends on the Hamiltonian or the selected (biorthonormal) basis. Crucially in addition, what is denoted as an ‘expectation value’ lacks a direct probabilistic interpretation, and what is viewed as the canonical density matrix is non-stationary and non-Hermitian. Furthermore, the non-unitarity of the time evolution is hidden within the formalism. We pick up several model Hamiltonians, which so far were either investigated from the Hermitian perspective or from the P T -symmetric and biorthogonal one, and study them within the respective alternative framework. This includes a simple two-level, single-particle problem but also a many-body lattice model showing quantum critical behavior. Comparing the outcome of the two types of computations shows that the Hermitian approach, which, admittedly, is in parts clumsy, always leads to results which are physically sensible. In the rare cases, in which a comparison to experimental data is possible, they furthermore agree to these. In contrast, the mathematically elegant P T -symmetric and biorthogonal approaches lead to results which, are partly difficult to interpret physically. We thus conclude that the Hermitian methodology should be employed. However, to fully appreciate the physics of P T -symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, it is also important to be aware of the main concepts of P T -symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. Our conclusion has far reaching consequences for the application of Green function methods, functional integrals, and generating functionals, which are at the heart of a large number of many-body methods. They cannot be transferred in their established forms to treat P T -symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum systems. It can be considered as an irony of fate that these methods are available only within the mathematical formalisms of P T -symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics.