A direct comparison of multi-energy x-ray and proton CT for imaging and relative stopping power estimation of plastic and ex-vivo phantoms

Author:

Fogazzi ElenaORCID,Hu GuyueORCID,Bruzzi Mara,Farace PaoloORCID,Kröncke Thomas,Niepel Katharina,Ricke Jens,Risch Franka,Sabel Bastian,Scaringella MonicaORCID,Schwarz Florian,Tommasino FrancescoORCID,Landry GuillaumeORCID,Civinini CarloORCID,Parodi KatiaORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objective. Proton therapy administers a highly conformal dose to the tumour region, necessitating accurate prediction of the patient’s 3D map of proton relative stopping power (RSP) compared to water. This remains challenging due to inaccuracies inherent in single-energy computed tomography (SECT) calibration. Recent advancements in spectral x-ray CT (xCT) and proton CT (pCT) have shown improved RSP estimation compared to traditional SECT methods. This study aims to provide the first comparison of the imaging and RSP estimation performance among dual-energy CT (DECT) and photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanners, and a pCT system prototype. Approach. Two phantoms were scanned with the three systems for their performance characterisation: a plastic phantom, filled with water and containing four plastic inserts and a wood insert, and a heterogeneous biological phantom, containing a formalin-stabilised bovine specimen. RSP maps were generated by converting CT numbers to RSP using a calibration based on low- and high-energy xCT images, while pCT utilised a distance-driven filtered back projection algorithm for RSP reconstruction. Spatial resolution, noise, and RSP accuracy were compared across the resulting images. Main results. All three systems exhibited similar spatial resolution of around 0.54 lp/mm for the plastic phantom. The PCCT images were less noisy than the DECT images at the same dose level. The lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of RSP, ( 0.28 ± 0.07 ) % , was obtained with the pCT system, compared to MAPE values of ( 0.51 ± 0.08 ) % and ( 0.80 ± 0.08 ) % for the DECT- and PCCT-based methods, respectively. For the biological phantom, the xCT-based methods resulted in higher RSP values in most of the voxels compared to pCT. Significance. The pCT system yielded the most accurate estimation of RSP values for the plastic materials, and was thus used to benchmark the xCT calibration performance on the biological phantom. This study underlined the potential benefits and constraints of utilising such a novel ex-vivo phantom for inter-centre surveys in future.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3