The first investigation of the dosimetric perturbations from the spot position errors in spot-scanning arc therapy (SPArc)

Abstract

Abstract Objective. To quantitatively investigate the impact of spot position error (PE) on the dose distribution in (Spot-scanning arc therapy) SPArc plans compared to Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT). Approach. Twelve representative cases, including brain, lung, liver, and prostate cancers, were retrospectively selected. Spot PEs were simulated during dynamic SPArc treatment delivery. Two types of errors were generated, including random error and systematic error. Two different probability distributions of random errors were used (1) Gaussian distribution (PEran-GS) (2) uniform distribution (PEran-UN). In PEran-UN, four sub-scenarios were considered: 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% spots were randomly selected in various directions on the scale of 0–1 mm or 0–2 mm of PE. Additionally, systematic error was simulated by shifting all the spot uniformly by 1 or 2 mm in various directions (PEsys). Gamma-index Passing Rate (GPR) is applied to assess the dosimetric perturbation quantitatively. Main results. For PEran-GS in the 1 mm scenario, both SPArc and IMPT are comparable with a GPR exceeding 99%. However, for PEran-GS in 2 mm scenario, SPArc could provide better GPR. As PEsys of 2 mm, SPArc plans have a much better GPR compared to IMPT plans: SPArc’s GPR is 99.59 ± 0.47%, 93.82 ± 4.07% and 64.58 ± 15.83% for 3 mm/3%, 2 mm/2% and 1 mm/1% criteria compared to IMPT with 97.49 ± 2.44%, 84.59 ± 4.99% and 42.02 ± 6.31%. Significance. Compared to IMPT, SPArc shows better dosimetric robustness in spot PEs. This study presents the first simulation results and the methodology that serves as a reference to guide future investigations into the accuracy and quality assurance of SPArc treatment delivery.