A model comparison assessing the importance of lateral groundwater flows at the global scale

Author:

de Graaf Inge E MORCID,Stahl KerstinORCID

Abstract

Abstract Current global-scale models of water resources do not generally represent groundwater lateral flows and groundwater–surface water interactions. But, models that do represent groundwater in more detail are becoming available and this raises the question of how estimates of water flow, availability, and impacts might change compared to previous global estimates. In this study, we provide the first global quantification of cell-to-cell groundwater flow (GWF) using a high-resolution global-scale GWF model and compare estimated impacts of groundwater pumping using two model setups: (a) with and (b) without including cell-to-cell GWFs and realistic simulation of groundwater–surface water interactions at the global scale (simulated over 1960–2010). Results show that 40% of the land–surface cell-to-cell flows are a notable part of the cell’s water budget and that globally large differences in the impact of groundwater pumping are estimatd between the two runs. Globally, simulated groundwater discharge to rivers and streams increased by a factor of 1.2–2.2 when GWFs and interactions between groundwater and surface water were included. For eight heavily pumped aquifers, estimates of groundwater depletion decrease by a factor of 1.7–22. Furthermore, our results show that GWFs and interactions between groundwater and surface water contribute to the volume of groundwater that can be pumped without causing notable changes in storage. However, in approximately 40% of the world’s watersheds where groundwater is used, groundwater is being pumped notably at the expense of river flow, and in 15% of the area globally depletion is increased as a result of nearby groundwater pumping. Evaluation of the model results showed that when groundwater lateral flows and groundwater–-surface water interactions were taken into account, the indirect observations of groundwater depletion and groundwater discharge were mimicked much better than when these fluxes were not included. Based on these findings, we suggest that including GWFs in large-scale water resources assessments will benefit a realistic assessment of groundwater availability worldwide, the estimation of impacts associated with groundwater pumping, especially when one is interested in the feedback between groundwater use and groundwater and surface water availability, and the impacts of current and future groundwater uses on the hydrological system.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3