Aboveground forest biomass varies across continents, ecological zones and successional stages: refined IPCC default values for tropical and subtropical forests

Author:

Rozendaal Danaë M AORCID,Requena Suarez DanielaORCID,De Sy VeroniqueORCID,Avitabile Valerio,Carter SarahORCID,Adou Yao C Y,Alvarez-Davila Esteban,Anderson-Teixeira KristinaORCID,Araujo-Murakami Alejandro,Arroyo Luzmila,Barca Benjamin,Baker Timothy R,Birigazzi Luca,Bongers Frans,Branthomme Anne,Brienen Roel J WORCID,Carreiras João M BORCID,Cazzolla Gatti Roberto,Cook-Patton Susan C,Decuyper Mathieu,DeVries Ben,Espejo Andres B,Feldpausch Ted R,Fox Julian,G P Gamarra JavierORCID,Griscom Bronson W,Harris Nancy,Hérault Bruno,Honorio Coronado Eurídice N,Jonckheere Inge,Konan Eric,Leavitt Sara M,Lewis Simon L,Lindsell Jeremy A,N’Dja Justin Kassi,N’Guessan Anny Estelle,Marimon Beatriz,Mitchard Edward T A,Monteagudo Abel,Morel Alexandra,Pekkarinen Anssi,Phillips Oliver L,Poorter Lourens,Qie Lan,Rutishauser Ervan,Ryan Casey M,Santoro Maurizio,Silayo Dos Santos,Sist Plinio,Slik J W Ferry,Sonké Bonaventure,Sullivan Martin J P,Vaglio Laurin Gaia,Vilanova Emilio,Wang Maria M H,Zahabu Eliakimu,Herold Martin

Abstract

Abstract For monitoring and reporting forest carbon stocks and fluxes, many countries in the tropics and subtropics rely on default values of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventories. Default IPCC forest AGB values originated from 2006, and are relatively crude estimates of average values per continent and ecological zone. The 2006 default values were based on limited plot data available at the time, methods for their derivation were not fully clear, and no distinction between successional stages was made. As part of the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for GHG Inventories, we updated the default AGB values for tropical and subtropical forests based on AGB data from >25 000 plots in natural forests and a global AGB map where no plot data were available. We calculated refined AGB default values per continent, ecological zone, and successional stage, and provided a measure of uncertainty. AGB in tropical and subtropical forests varies by an order of magnitude across continents, ecological zones, and successional stage. Our refined default values generally reflect the climatic gradients in the tropics, with more AGB in wetter areas. AGB is generally higher in old-growth than in secondary forests, and higher in older secondary (regrowth >20 years old and degraded/logged forests) than in young secondary forests (⩽20 years old). While refined default values for tropical old-growth forest are largely similar to the previous 2006 default values, the new default values are 4.0–7.7-fold lower for young secondary forests. Thus, the refined values will strongly alter estimated carbon stocks and fluxes, and emphasize the critical importance of old-growth forest conservation. We provide a reproducible approach to facilitate future refinements and encourage targeted efforts to establish permanent plots in areas with data gaps.

Funder

ESA GlobBiomass

JAXA

European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant

NERC and the National Centre for Earth Observation

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

U.K. Natural Environment Research Council

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

CNPq

Children’s Investment 309 Fund Foundation

COmON Foundation and Good Energies Foundation

International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German

Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety

Norwegian International Climate and Forest Initiative

EU Horizon 2020 project VERIFY

CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP‐FTA) with financial support from the CGIAR Fund Donors

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3