Abstract
Abstract
The reply herein shows the factual incorrectness of the comment by Eladawy, Asefa and El Nour, which is primarily supported by miscitations and misinterpretations of published research, as well as by claims from social media and unreliable TV interviews. The comment mistakenly ommit the different components of the calculated total water budget deficit in our paper and accordingly claims that it is primarily aimed to create a ‘water panic’, a term that derives from a non-quantitative and subjective reading of the abstract. We show in detail that the comment misrepresents the aim, approach, results, and interpretations reported in our original paper and does not provide any verification on the reproducibility of our results, nor offers any alternative interpretations or suggested impacts on our conclusions which remain valid and unchallenged by the above comment.
Funder
University of Southern California
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference17 articles.
1. Response of deep aquifers to climate variability;Abdelmohsen;Sci. Total Environ.,2019
2. What can the GRACE seasonal cycle tell us about lake-aquifer interactions?;Abdelmohsen;Earth-Sci. Rev.,2020
3. We insult and incite and the state knows… ‘on the incitement and defamation in Egyptian media’, report from Arabic network for human rights information (ANHRI),2019
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献