A comparison of consumer-grade electronic radon monitors

Abstract

Abstract Radon is a radioactive gas which is naturally occurring in soil and can accumulate to concentrated levels inside homes and buildings. Exposure to elevated levels of radon leads to an increased risk of developing lung cancer. In recent years there has been a rise in the popularity of consumer-grade electronic radon monitors. The monitors are appealing to homeowners due to the ease of use and the ability to keep track of radon levels during the process of conducting a radon test. However, there is currently no independent process to evaluate the relative performance of these monitors against known levels of radon. In this study, three sample units of six different models representing three different manufacturers of consumer-grade electronic radon monitors were exposed to three different levels of radon in a controlled environment to evaluate their precision and accuracy. Two separate tests were conducted at the Canadian guideline level to accommodate for ‘indoor winter’ and ‘summer’ conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare the performance of the different consumer-grade electronic radon monitors and determine which factors should be considered when using these monitors to inform mitigation decisions. The monitors had a range of uncertainty from 2%–15% with a range of precision from 1%–24%. The monitors performed better at higher radon levels than at levels near the Canadian guideline level of 200 Bq m−3, and slightly better during ‘summer’ conditions than during ‘indoor winter’ conditions. While the monitors provide homeowners with a very specific number indicating their radon level, it was noted that this number should be considered with respect to a ‘confidence ratio’ or ‘range’ which could be done through a publicly available online tool which could provide the radon level range for a given radon level and device grade.