A novel algorithm to assess the quality of 12-lead ECG recordings: validation in a real telecardiology application

Author:

de Moraes Jermana LORCID,Paixão Gabriela M MORCID,Gomes Paulo RORCID,Mendes Eduardo M A MORCID,Ribeiro Antônio Luiz PORCID,Beda AlessandroORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objective. Automatic detection of Electrocardiograms (ECG) quality is fundamental to minimize costs and risks related to delayed diagnosis due to low ECG quality. Most algorithms to assess ECG quality include non-intuitive parameters. Also, they were developed using data non-representative of a real-world scenario, in terms of pathological ECGs and overrepresentation of low-quality ECG. Therefore, we introduce an algorithm to assess 12-lead ECG quality, Noise Automatic Classification Algorithm (NACA) developed in Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais (TNMG). Approach. NACA estimates a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for each ECG lead, where ‘signal’ is an estimated heartbeat template, and ‘noise’ is the discrepancy between the template and the ECG heartbeat. Then, clinically-inspired rules based on SNR are used to classify the ECG as acceptable or unacceptable. NACA was compared with Quality Measurement Algorithm (QMA), the winner of Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2011 (ChallengeCinC) by using five metrics: sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), F 2, and cost reduction resulting from adoption of the algorithm. Two datasets were used for validation: TestTNMG, consisting of 34 310 ECGs received by TNMG (1% unacceptable and 50% pathological); ChallengeCinC, consisting of 1000 ECGs (23% unacceptable, higher than real-world scenario). Main results. Both algorithms reached a similar performance on ChallengeCinC, although NACA performed considerably better than QMA in TestTNMG (Se = 0.89 versus 0.21; Sp = 0.99 versus 0.98; PPV = 0.59 versus 0.08; F 2 = 0.76 versus 0.16 and cost reduction 2.3 ± 1.8% versus 0.3 ± 0.3%, respectively). Significance. Implementing of NACA in a telecardiology service results in evident health and financial benefits for the patients and the healthcare system.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering,Physiology,Biophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3