Author:
Mohd Kamil Abdul `Izz,Mokhtar Badruddin,Saidin Mohamad Tajudin,Ejau Ruth Lua,Zaki Zulkhairy Affandy,Hassan Ahmad Arzlee
Abstract
Abstract
Malaysia’s construction industry is rapidly growing from time to time. The bidding decision of construction projects is a very complex decision-making process which affected by several factors. Usually, to obtain good quality, cost, time, and safety is the primary goal of the construction project, which the contractors will compete in the tendering process to get a project, and most of the construction work in Malaysia was awarded based on competitive tendering. With the limited information and time, the contractor has to decide whether to tender or vice versa. The paper aims to explore the challenges in conducting strategic decisions in tendering among contractors in Malaysia. A set of questionnaires are used to collect the data for the study. The sampling method used in this study was random sampling and quota sampling. The study only focuses on the contractors in Klang Valley as Klang valley is known as the heartland of Malaysia’s industry and commerce. The data was gathered and analysed by using SPSS. The result of this study was in the form of ranking with the mean value as the ranking indicator. As a result of the questionnaire, most respondents agree that the biggest Challenges in conducting strategic decisions in tendering are the need of the contractor to win a project. The contractor must have sufficient data in deciding to tender. Adequate information regarding the project is vital as it acts as a reference for an estimator to estimate the project cost. Estimating is a critical factor that influences the contractor’s success in the tendering and ensures that the contractor can do the work diligently as stated in the contract.
Reference8 articles.
1. Evolutionary simulation of contractors’ learning and behaviour under two bid-tendering approaches;Awwad;Journal of Management in Engineering,2016
2. Key factors in bid reasoning model;Chua;Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2000
3. A fíamewoík foí contíactoís to íeach stíategically coííect bid/no bid and maík-up size decisions;Egemen;Building and Enviíonment,2007
4. A REVIEW ON COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURE AND STRATEGY OF BIDDING;Prajapati;JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor,2015
5. Bid Evaluation Strategy Among G7Construction Companies In Northern States Of Malaysia;Zainon;RESEARCH JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND HYDROBIOLOGY 2016.,2016