Author:
Dwiyantoro W,Fathani T F,Adi A D
Abstract
Abstract
The building structure design needs to pay attention to the seismic code and all its consequences. Building A which will be built in Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta is 12.20 km from the Opak Fault causing the Bantul Earthquake of Mw 6.3 in 2006, needs seismic analysis properly using SNI 1726:2019. Based on the site near fault criteria on seismic code, Building A does not belong to the site near fault category, so it used the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis method. However, considering its distance and magnitude, the value is in the range of the requirements limit. Hence, it is still relevant when compared to the Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis method for designing the response spectrum. Based on the site classification in the seismic code, a site that is vulnerable to liquefaction belongs to the site class F and therefore requires site-specific analysis. The site-specific surface response spectrum is taken from the equivalent-linear and non-linear site response analysis using Deepsoil v7.0 software. The response spectrum is also calculated based on site class according to the shear wave velocity (v
s) and N-SPT criteria. The site-specific spectral acceleration results are compared to 80% of the site class E spectral acceleration, as required. The site belongs to site class D using v
s criteria and belongs to site class E using the N-SPT criteria. Only the equivalent-linear site response spectrum in the modified maximum horizontal direction spectrum is eligible when compared to requirements. Most of the non-linear site response spectrum results or the geometric mean response spectrum of the equivalent-linear site response results can satisfy the requirements compared to 80% of the site class D spectral acceleration because the site response analysis uses the v
s parameter. The non-linear site response spectral acceleration is smaller than the equivalent-linear site response spectral acceleration.