Impact of internal-delensing biases on searches for primordial 𝖡-modes of CMB polarisation

Author:

Baleato Lizancos Antón,Challinor Anthony,Carron Julien

Abstract

Abstract Searches for the imprint of primordial gravitational waves in degree-scale CMB B-mode polarisation data must account for significant contamination from gravitational lensing. Fortunately, the lensing effects can be partially removed by combining high-resolution E-mode measurements with an estimate of the projected matter distribution. In the near future, experimental characteristics will be such that the latter can be reconstructed internally with high fidelity from the observed CMB, with the EB quadratic estimator providing a large fraction of the signal-to-noise. It is a well-known phenomenon in this context that any overlap in modes between the B-field to be delensed and the B-field from which the reconstruction is derived leads to a suppression of delensed power going beyond that which can be attributed to a mitigation of the lensing effects. More importantly, the variance associated with this spectrum is also reduced, posing the question of whether the additional power suppression could help better constrain the tensor-to-scalar ratio, r. In this paper, we show this is not the case, as suggested but not quantified in previous work. We develop an analytic model for the biased delensed B-mode angular power spectrum, which suggests a simple renormalisation prescription to avoid bias on the inferred tensor-to-scalar ratio. With this approach, we learn that the bias necessarily leads to a degradation of the signal-to-noise on a primordial component compared to “unbiased delensing”. Next, we assess the impact of removing from the lensing reconstruction any overlapping B-modes on our ability to constrain r, showing that it is in general advantageous to do this rather than modelling or renormalising the bias. Finally, we verify these results within a maximum-likelihood inference framework applied to simulations.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3