Redshift requirements for cosmic shear with intrinsic alignment

Author:

Fischbacher Silvan,Kacprzak Tomasz,Blazek Jonathan,Refregier Alexandre

Abstract

Abstract Intrinsic alignment (IA) modelling and photometric redshift estimation are two of the main sources of systematic uncertainty in weak lensing surveys. We investigate the impact of redshift errors and their interplay with different IA models. Generally, errors on the mean δz and on the width σz of the redshift bins can both lead to biases in cosmological constraints. We find that such biases can, however, only be partially resolved by marginalizing over δz   and σz . For Stage-III surveys, δz and σz cannot be well constrained due to limited statistics. The resulting biases are thus sensitive to prior volume effects. For Stage-IV surveys, we observe that marginalizing over the redshift parameters has an impact and reduces the bias. We derive requirements on the uncertainty of σz and δz for both Stage-III and Stage-IV surveys. We assume that the redshift systematic errors on S 8 should be less than half of the statistical errors, and the median bias should be smaller than 0.25σ. We find that the uncertainty on δz has to be ≲ 0.025 for the NLA IA model with a Stage-III survey. We find no requirement threshold for σz since the requirements are met even for our maximum prior width of 0.3. For the TATT IA model, the uncertainty on δz has to be ≲ 0.02 and the uncertainty on σz has to be ≲ 0.2. Current redshift precision of Stage-III surveys is therefore high enough to meet these requirements. For Stage-IV surveys, systematic effects will be more important due to the higher statistical precision. In this case, the uncertainty on δz has to be ≲ 0.005 and the uncertainty on σz should be ≲ 0.1, with no significant dependence on the IA model. This required high precision will be a challenge for the redshift calibration of these future surveys. Finally, we investigate whether the interplay between redshift systematics and IA modelling can explain the S 8-tension between cosmic shear results and CMB measurements. We find that this is unlikely to explain the current S 8-tension. The code that was used to conduct this analysis is publicly available.[refrigerator: https://cosmo-gitlab.phys.ethz.ch/cosmo_public/refrigerator.]

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Reference85 articles.

1. Weak gravitational lensing;Bartelmann;Phys. Rept.,2001

2. Weak gravitational lensing by large scale structure;Refregier;Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.,2003

3. Weak Gravitational Lensing and its Cosmological Applications;Hoekstra;Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.,2008

4. Cosmology with Weak Lensing Surveys;Munshi;Phys. Rept.,2008

5. Gravitational Lensing;Bartelmann;Class. Quant. Grav.,2010

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3