Comparison of volume measurements of mass standards at low pressures and in liquids

Author:

Zůda JaroslavORCID

Abstract

Abstract The determination of the volumes of mass standards is key to the precise determination of their masses, due to the effect of the air buoyancy force. The buoyancy force can either be reduced by mass determination at low pressure or enlarged for a determination of the apparent mass using a vessel filled with liquid. The standard method for the volume calibration of weights is comparison in liquid, as described in the document OIML R111. This report presents the results of calibrating the volumes of stainless-steel mass standards with a nominal mass of 1 kg at low pressure and in a liquid. The authors showed that both methods produced comparable results with maximum differences of 0.002 cm3 when adjusted for a standard temperature of 20 °C. The typical uncertainty in the volumes given by both methods is 0.002 cm3. A major source of uncertainty is the volume of the reference weight. The authors conclude that both methods produce consistent results, so that the method of volume calibration at low pressure can be used instead of hydrostatic weighing. The advantage of this approach is that both the masses and volumes of the weights are measured using the same mass comparator, which requires less manipulation. This study will help to establish the procedures for the dissemination and transfer of the mass unit from vacuum to ambient conditions in the institute of the author.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Instrumentation,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference11 articles.

1. Conférence Générale des poids et mesures,2018

2. Beginning of a new phase of the dissemination of the kilogram;Davidson;Metrologia,2021

3. Mass comparison using air buoyancy artefacts;Picard;Metrologia,2004

4. Buoyancy contribution to uncertainty of mass, conventional mass and force;Malengo;Metrologia,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3