Abstract
Abstract
Objective. Chronopotentiometric voltage transients (VTs) are used to assess the performance of bionic electrodes. The data obtained from VTs are used to define the safe operating conditions of clinical devices. Various approaches to analysing VTs have been reported, and a number of limitations in the accuracy of the measurements in relation to electrode size have been noted previously. Approach. The impact of electronic hardware and electrode configuration on VTs is discussed. Main results. The slew rate, rise time, sample time, minimum pulse length and waveform averaging characteristics of the electronic hardware, and electrode configuration will impact on VT measurement accuracy. Subsequently, activation and polarisation voltage measurements, and the definition of safe stimulation levels can be affected by the electronic hardware and electrode configuration. Significance. This article has identified some limitations in the previous literature related to the measurement and reporting of VTs and subsequent analysis of access and polarisation voltages. Furthermore, the commonly used Shannon plot used to define safe stimulation protocols does not correct for uncompensated resistance, account for electrode roughness or changes in electrode configuration. The creation of a safe stimulation plot which has been corrected for uncompensated resistance would generate more widely applicable stimulation guidelines for clinical devices used in different anatomical locations such as endovascular neural interfaces.