Abstract
Abstract
Some indicators used to track the progress of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) suffer from a lack of reported data, and therefore need estimates to fill the data gaps. Using crop model outputs and global cropping system datasets, we present a modeling of small-scale farmer productivity and agricultural output (conceptually similar to the formal SDG 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 indicator, respectively). We analyze the responses of the indicators for 106 low- and middle-income countries for the periods 2051–2060 and 2091–2100, relative to 2001–2010, to various scenarios of climate, socioeconomic development, cost-free adaptation, and irrigation expansion. The results show the potentials of modeling in gap-filling of reported national data, and that the agricultural output indicator indicates the positive effect of climate mitigation to small-scale farmers. The contributions of adaptation are evident when agricultural output indicator is used but are no longer visible, or even wrongly interpreted, when productivity indicator is used, underling the importance of selecting robust indicators to track SDG goals in a changing climate. Also discussed are the caveats identified in the SDG 2.3 indicators that enable the design of indicators more aligned with the other development goals, such as poverty eradication.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Earth-Surface Processes,Geology,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),General Environmental Science,Food Science
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献