Statistical and machine learning methods applied to the prediction of different tropical rainfall types
-
Published:2021-11-01
Issue:11
Volume:3
Page:111001
-
ISSN:2515-7620
-
Container-title:Environmental Research Communications
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Environ. Res. Commun.
Author:
Wang JiayiORCID,
Wong Raymond K WORCID,
Jun Mikyoung,
Schumacher Courtney,
Saravanan R,
Sun Chunmei
Abstract
Abstract
Predicting rain from large-scale environmental variables remains a challenging problem for climate models and it is unclear how well numerical methods can predict the true characteristics of rainfall without smaller (storm) scale information. This study explores the ability of three statistical and machine learning methods to predict 3-hourly rain occurrence and intensity at 0.5° resolution over the tropical Pacific Ocean using rain observations the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite radar and large-scale environmental profiles of temperature and moisture from the MERRA-2 reanalysis. We also separated the rain into different types (deep convective, stratiform, and shallow convective) because of their varying kinematic and thermodynamic structures that might respond to the large-scale environment in different ways. Our expectation was that the popular machine learning methods (i.e., the neural network and random forest) would outperform a standard statistical method (a generalized linear model) because of their more flexible structures, especially in predicting the highly skewed distribution of rain rates for each rain type. However, none of the methods obviously distinguish themselves from one another and each method still has issues with predicting rain too often and not fully capturing the high end of the rain rate distributions, both of which are common problems in climate models. One implication of this study is that machine learning tools must be carefully assessed and are not necessarily applicable to solving all big data problems. Another implication is that traditional climate model approaches are not sufficient to predict extreme rain events and that other avenues need to be pursued.
Funder
Department of Energy and Climate Change
National Institutes of Health
T3 grant
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Texas A&M University Open Access to Knowledge Fund
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Earth-Surface Processes,Geology,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),General Environmental Science,Food Science
Reference39 articles.
1. The cumulus parameterization problem: past, present, and future;Arakawa;J. Clim.,2004
2. Sparsely-Connected Neural Networks: Towards Efficient VLSI Implementation of Deep Neural Networks;Ardakani,2017
3. Understanding dropout;Baldi;Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2013
4. Random forests;Breiman;Mach. Learn.,2001
5. Prognostic validation of a neural network unified physics parameterization;Brenowitz;Geophys. Res. Lett.,2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献