Abstract
PurposeThis study investigated the use of language impoliteness of primary school teachers in communicating with their students during the learning process.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology of this study used a mixed-method approach by involving 100 primary school teachers in the fifth and sixth grades. The researcher used the language politeness/impoliteness scale developed by Mantasiah et al. (2019) to measure teachers' language impoliteness. This scale was developed based on Brown and Levinson's theory who divided politeness maxims into six consisting of tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, appreciation maxim, agreement maxim and sympathy maxim. The levels of teachers' language impoliteness were divided into five categories (5 = always, 4 = often, 3 = sometimes, 2 = rarely, 1 = never).FindingsThe finding shows that 28% of teachers were in the sometimes category and 33% of teachers were in the rarely category. The results signify that some teachers tend to speak impolitely with the students during the learning process. They considered that it was acceptable as they did not know the negative effects caused by their impolite language. Moreover, teachers were more likely to violate sympathy, tact and agreement maxims than other maxims.Practical implicationsThe finding of this study can be applied generally at all levels of education, ranging from primary education to higher education, as a base to develop a program to improve the soft skills of teachers especially the way teachers communicate with their students in the learning process. By understanding language politeness theory, the awareness of teachers in communicating in the learning process can be improved, which can affect positively to the quality of learning process.Originality/valueNumerous studies conducted on communication skills of teachers focused on using communication sciences approach. This study tried to use another approach to portray the communication skills of teachers based on language politeness uttered using linguistics approach. Moreover, previous studies preferred to conduct language politeness and impoliteness of teachers in senior high schools and lecturers in university, and there is still lack of studies focusing on language politeness of primary school teachers.
Reference48 articles.
1. Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students;Heliyon,2020
2. Pedagogical ability in self-development of A future primary school teacher,2023
3. Classroom interaction practices and students' learning outcomes in physics: implication for teaching-skill development for physics teachers;Journal of Education and E-Learning Research,2019
4. Observational analysis of violence on children and the implications for parenting program development;Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education,2020
5. Politeness principle: a comparative study of English and Moroccan Arabic requests, offers and thanks;European Journal of Social Sciences,2011