Abstract
PurposeThis article challenges the prevailing view that a minimum income for the poor is only relevant to basic needs. It contributes to the discussion on the meanings of money by specifically focusing on the Italian Citizenship Income scheme as a case study.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative research design was developed and implemented in four regions of northern Italy. The analysis is based on 131 in-depth interviews with minimum income recipients.FindingsThe empirical analysis shows that money transfer has various meanings. Four dimensions are identified: functional, relational, protective, and emancipatory. The first two are connected to spending, while the latter two are related to self-identity. Although the four dimensions may overlap and coexist in the daily lives of minimum income beneficiaries, they are distinguished for analytical purposes.Originality/valueThe article presents a comprehensive analysis of the multiple meanings that minimum income can have for beneficiaries; meanings which are often not explicitly addressed in social policy studies. It goes beyond the equally important consideration of material needs by adding other meaningful aspects. This approach makes a different way of looking at cash transfers possible, and it provides elements useful for the design and analysis of minimum income policies.
Reference45 articles.
1. ‘Poveri e imbroglioni’. Dentro il Rdc;Il Mulino, Rivista trimestrale di cultura e di politica,2020
2. The psychology of windfall gains;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1994
3. Lone motherhood, poverty and the meaning of money;Affilia: Feminist Inquiry in Social Work,2024