The effects of ontology-based and password-protected blog access control on perceived privacy benefit and perceived ease of use

Author:

Liu Chi-Lun

Abstract

Purpose – This work empirically evaluates the effectiveness of the novel ontology-based access-control mechanism and the common password-protected access-control mechanism for social blogs. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The ontology-based access-control scheme is designed to fit two characteristics of blog activities: social relationships and tags. A laboratory experiment is conducted to assess the perceived privacy benefit and perceived ease of use of the two mechanisms. Findings – Analytical results indicate that, with the ontology-based access-control scheme, users perceive more privacy benefit than with the password-protected access-control scheme. The perceived ease of use with the ontology-based and password-protected access-control systems did not differ significantly. Research limitations/implications – Cross-boundary collaborations need an appropriate approach to control communication access. Further study is required to evaluate the ontology-based access-control scheme applied in cross-organizational and cross-departmental collaborations. Practical implications – From a knowledge management perspective, blogs can store personal and organizational knowledge and experiences. The ontology-based access-control scheme encourages knowledge sharing for appropriate persons. Originality/value – The new ontology-based access-control mechanism can help online users keep secrets from selected people to gain more privacy benefits than the existing password-protected access-control mechanism.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference30 articles.

1. Bansal, G. , Zahedi, F.M. and Gefen, D. (2010), “The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 138-150.

2. Chen, H.G. , Chen, C.C. , Lo, L. and Yang, S.C. (2008), “Online privacy control via anonymity and pseudonym: cross-cultural implications”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 229-242.

3. Cho, E.A. , Moon, C.J. , Park, D.H. and Baik, D.K. (2008), “An approach to privacy enhancement for access control model in Web 3.0”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, Busan, pp. 1046-1051, available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4682385&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4682385 (accessed April 7, 2013).

4. Counts, S. , Hofte, H.T. and Smith, I. (2006), “Mobile social software: realizing potential, managing risks”, Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, pp. 1703-1706, available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1125767&dl=ACM&coll=DL&CFID=348793633&CFTOKEN=92521574 (accessed April 7, 2013).

5. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-340.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3