Author:
Zarley Watson Maegan,Yan Ruoh‐Nan
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the study is to explore the differences between fast fashion and slow fashion consumers in regards to their consumer decision process stages (i.e. purchase/consumption, post‐consumption evaluation, and divestment).Design/methodology/approachQualitative data were collected via focus groups and personal interviews. Participants were recruited through flyers that were posted at various locations, including a college campus, select retail stores, and www.craigslist.com The sample consisted of 38 participants, 22 fast fashion and 16 slow fashion. All participants were female, 18 years of age or older, with a mean age of 21.2 years.FindingsThree groups of themes emerged. The purchase/consumption themes were buyers’ remorse avoidance, utilitarianism, hedonism, and style/self‐image congruence. The post‐consumption evaluation themes included instant satisfaction vs continued satisfaction and consumer expectation confirmation. Finally, the divestment themes consisted of divestment frequencies, divestment reasons, and divestment approaches.Research limitations/implicationsThis study explored the purchase and post‐purchase stages of the Consumer Decision Process (CDP) model. This particular focus on the CDP model, in the context of fast (vs slow) fashion, has not been researched in the past. Additionally, this research adds to the body of knowledge by utilizing the CDP model to understand the differences between fast fashion and slow fashion consumers.Practical implicationsFast fashion and slow fashion retailers may use this research to better understand their target markets by understanding why they choose to purchase/consume, what influences their post‐consumption evaluation, and how and why they choose to divest their clothing.Originality/valuePast research has demonstrated the importance of understanding the supply chain and business model aspect of fast fashion. However, no empirical studies have been found that examine the decision‐making process of consumers of fast (vs slow) fashion.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference39 articles.
1. Apparel Magazine (2009), “Restore clothing”, May, pp. 10‐11.
2. Bagwell, L.S. and Bernheim, B.D. (1996), “Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86 No. 30, pp. 346‐373.
3. Barnes, L. and Lea‐Greenwood, G. (2006), “Fast fashioning the supply chain: shaping the research agenda”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 259‐271.
4. Behling, D. (1985), “Fashion change and demographics: a model”, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 18‐24.
5. Birtwistle, G. and Moore, C.M. (2007), “Fashion clothing – where does it all end up?”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 210‐216.
Cited by
129 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献