Author:
Chen Shuai,Wang Weiwen,Zhou Juan,Zhang Shuyue,Ge Anqi,Feng Juan,Zhou Yun
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to propose a novel candidate view of research on employer reputation. The authors examine how candidates evaluate a company’s employer reputation after failing in the job application process.
Design/methodology/approach
The data were mainly collected from Chinese university students. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the proposed hypotheses (n = 246).
Findings
The study reveals how candidates vary in their attributions of job-hunting failures and evaluations of employer reputation considering their different personalities (i.e. extraversion) and corporations’ procedural justice in the selection process. The empirical results show that rejected candidates’ trait extraversion and procedural justice in the selection process combine to influence internal attributions and thus affect their evaluations of employer reputation.
Originality/value
Understanding how rejected candidates evaluate employer reputation is vital to advancing employer reputation theory. This is one of the few studies to pursue this line of research. The research may also help companies develop more effective strategies to manage the candidates they reject and to maintain their employer reputations.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing
Reference71 articles.
1. Justice perceptions of artificial intelligence in selection;International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2020
2. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions;Institute for Social and Economic Research,1991
3. Altiero, M. (2016), “Real life: how a horrible candidate experience hurts your brand”, JIBE, available at: www.jibe.com/blog/how-a-horrible-candidate-experience-hurts-your-brand/
4. The mediating role of feedback acceptance in the relationship between feedback and attitudinal and performance outcomes;International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2009
5. Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback;Journal of Applied Psychology,1998