Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

Author:

Ribera Mireia,Porras Merce,Boldu Marc,Termens Miquel,Sule Andreu,Paris Pilar

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explain the changes in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 compared with WCAG 1.0 within the context of its historical development.Design/methodology/approachIn order to compare WCAG 2.0 with WCAG 1.0 a diachronic analysis of the evolution of these standards is done. Known authors and publications in the field, the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) web pages, WebAIM and the blogosphere were also monitored for comments and third‐party analyses. The analysis of the main changes from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 was based on personal experience with WAI guidelines, experimentation with some of the new guidelines, and a selection of best practice online services in the application of the WCAG, including WAI documentation.FindingsWCAG 2.0 is more educational and is applied to more technologies than WCAG 1.0. The limitations of WCAG 1.0 are mostly due to its origin. In changing from one to the other, new priorities and new elements must be taken into account. The paper concludes that though these guidelines are a useful tool for governments, they are only the first step towards accessibility, which can only be achieved through user‐centred design.Originality/valueThis paper explains the significance and limitations of the WCAG and gives a short guide to adapting web sites to the new regulations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference24 articles.

1. Arch, A. (2009), “Web accessibility for older users successes and opportunities”, Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross‐Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 1‐6.

2. Bolchini, D., Colazzo, S. and Paolini, P. (2006), “Requirements for aural web sites”, Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution, Philadelphia, pp. 75‐82.

3. Boscarol, M. (2006), “Working with others: accessibility and user research”, A List Apart, No. 225, available at: www.alistapart.com/articles/workingwithothers (accessed 27 March 2009).

4. Brys, C.M. and Vanderbauwhede, W. (2006), “Communication challenges in the W3C's web content accessibility guidelines”, Technical Communication, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 60‐78.

5. Clark, J. (2006), “To hell with WCAG 2”, A List Apart, No. 217, available at: www.alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2 (accessed 27 March 2009).

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Personalised Support Centre for Mathematics in Engineering Adapted to Students' Preferences, Knowledge and Needs;2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2023-05-01

2. Roadmap for the Development of EnLang4All: A Video Game for Learning English;Multimodal Technologies and Interaction;2023-02-03

3. Accessibility Feedback in Mobile Application Reviews: A Dataset of Reviews and Accessibility Guidelines;CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts;2022-04-27

4. Investigating the Accessibility of Crowdwork Tasks on Mechanical Turk;Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2021-05-06

5. Towards Accessibility in Education through Smart Speakers. An ontology based approach;Procedia Computer Science;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3