Author:
Caputo Tullio,McIntyre Michael Louis,Wang Lucy Meng Yi,Hodgkinson Tarah K.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a test in a policing context of a performance assessment tool that is based on a “public values” approach. The Capability, Importance, and Value (CIV) Tool allows police organizations to examine the roles their members carry out to determine whether they are being capably done, are important, and deliver value to stakeholders.
Design/methodology/approach
Five focus groups were conducted with front line officers from a large Canadian police service. The focus group process incorporated elements of Appreciative Inquiry and Structured Brainstorming.
Findings
Valuable information can be collected from front line police officers with the CIV Tool. Police organizations could use this information to improve performance while ensuring that the roles undertaken by their members align with broader organizational goals and objectives including providing value to stakeholders.
Research limitations/implications
This study was designed as a limited test of the CIV Tool. More extensive testing is required with a larger sample that includes police investigators and members of other specialty units.
Practical implications
The CIV Tool can serve to augment existing police performance measurement strategies. It can help to identify which roles contribute to achieving organizational goals and which do not. Based on this information, ameliorative action can be taken.
Social implications
A “public values” approach places emphasis on stakeholder needs and expectations. Addressing these directly can result in enhanced performance as well as greater police transparency, responsiveness, and accountability.
Originality/value
Ongoing police performance assessment based on a “public values” approach is uncommon in policing. Its use has important implications for police organizations and their stakeholders.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference57 articles.
1. Estimating public performance bias through an MTMM model: the case of police performance in 26 European countries;Policy Studies,2014
2. Barrett, K. and Greene, R. (2015), “Did performance measurement cause America’s police problem?”, Governing, June 4, available at: www.governing.com/authors/Katherine-Barrett-and-Richard-Greene.html
3. A comparative study of the attitudes of urban suburban and rural police officers in New Jersey regarding the use of force;Crime Law and Social Change,2009
4. Challenges, issues and change: what’s the future for UK policing in the twenty-first century?;International Journal of Public Sector Management,2011
5. Targeted criteria performance improvement;International Journal of Public Sector Management,2011
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献