Evaluation of production control strategies for negligible‐setup, multi‐product, serial lines with consideration for robustness

Author:

Olaitan Oladipupo A.,Geraghty John

Abstract

PurposeThe aims of this paper is to investigate simulation‐based optimisation and stochastic dominance testing while employing kanban‐like production control strategies (PCS) operating dedicated and, where applicable, shared kanban card allocation policies in a multi‐product system with negligible set‐up times and with consideration for robustness to uncertainty.Design/methodology/approachDiscrete event simulation and a genetic algorithm were utilised to optimise the control parameters for dedicated kanban control strategy (KCS), CONWIP and base stock control strategy (BSCS), extended kanban control strategy (EKCS) and generalised kanban control strategy (GKCS) as well as the shared versions of EKCS and GKCS. All‐pairwise comparisons and a ranking and selection technique were employed to compare the performances of the strategies and select the best strategy without consideration of robustness to uncertainty. A latin hypercube sampling experimental design and stochastic dominance testing were utilised to determine the preferred strategy when robustness to uncertainty is considered.FindingsThe findings of this work show that shared GKCS outperforms other strategies when robustness is not considered. However, when robustness of the strategies to uncertainty in the production environment is considered, the results of our research show that the dedicated EKCS is preferred. The effect of system bottleneck location on the inventory accumulation behaviour of different strategies is reported and this was also observed to have a relationship to the nature of a PCS's kanban information transmission.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study are directly relevant to industry where increasing market pressures for product diversity require operating multi‐product production lines with negligible set‐up times. The optimization and robustness test approaches employed in this work can be extended to the analysis of more complicated system configurations and higher number of product types.Originality/valueThis work involves further investigation into the performance of multi‐product kanban‐like PCS by examining their robustness to common sources of uncertainties after they have been initially optimized for base scenarios. The results of the robustness tests also provide new insights into how dedicated kanban card allocation policies might offer higher flexibility and robustness over shared policies under conditions of uncertainty.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering,Software

Reference41 articles.

1. Alabas, C., Altiparmak, F. and Dengiz, B. (2000), “The optimization of number of Kanbans with genetic algorithms, simulated annealing and Tabu search”, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 1, pp. 580‐585.

2. Baynat, B., Buzacott, J.A. and Dallery, Y. (2002), “Multi‐product Kanban‐like control systems”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 40 No. 16, pp. 4225‐4255.

3. Baynat, B., Dallery, Y., Di Mascolo, M. and Frein, Y. (2001), “A multi‐class approximation technique for the analysis of Kanban‐like control systems”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 307‐328.

4. Bhuvnaesh, K. (2006), “A comparison of traditional and extended information Kanban control systems using dedicated and shared Kanbans”, MSc thesis, School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.

5. Bonvik, A.M. and Gershwin, S.B. (1996), “Beyond Kanban: creating and analyzing lean shop floor control policies”, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Conference Proceedings, Dartmouth College, The Amos Tuck School Hanover, NH, USA, June, pp. 46‐51.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3