Abstract
PurposeGenerative Production Systems are generative design computation that is linked to optimal physical production. They can improve the design and production of products which have unique geometries. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a preliminary methodology for Generative Production Systems.Design/methodology/approachThe paper takes the form of a literature review investigating the structures and formats of successful methodologies. The literature review also investigates Generative Production Systems' theoretical foundations, development and implementations.FindingsThe potential of Generative Production Systems is restricted because enabling information is fragmented and difficult to access. In other fields, such barriers have been overcome through the introduction of methodologies that provide guiding principles, rules and strategies (P‐R‐S). The P‐R‐S type of methodology structure is suitable for Generative Production Systems.Practical implicationsThe use of Generative Production Systems requires more upfront investment than the use of CAD/CAM software packages. However, they require little, or no, human input after they are set‐up. The preliminary methodology provides structured guidance about how to set up a Generative Production System. Further, the explanatory text enables wider understanding of Generative Production Systems, and how they can improve design and production.Originality/valueAn analysis is provided for the structure and format of successful methodologies in general. A preliminary methodology for Generative Production Systems is introduced. Further, the paper provides an overview of the disadvantages and advantages of Generative Production Systems compared to typical CAD/CAM software packages.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference75 articles.
1. Agarwal, M. and Cagan, J. (1998), “A blend of different tastes: the language of coffee makers”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 205‐26.
2. Agarwal, M. and Cagan, J. (2000), “On the use of shape grammars as expert systems for geometry‐based engineering design”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 431‐9.
3. Agarwal, M., Cagan, J. and Constantine, K. (1999), “Influencing generative design through continuous evaluation: associating costs with the coffeemaker shape grammar”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 253‐75 (Special Issue on Generative Systems in Design).
4. Ahmad, S. and Chase, S.C. (2006), “Grammar representations to facilitate style innovation: an example from mobile phone design”, in Bourdakis, V. and Charitos, D. (Eds), Communicating Spaces, Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe), Volos, Greece, pp. 320‐4.
5. Ansoff, H.I. (2007), Strategic Management Classic Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献