Bibliometric data and actual development in technology life cycles: flaws in assumptions

Author:

Suominen Arho,Seppänen Marko

Abstract

Purpose Motivated with the ever growing number of bibliometric trend extrapolation studies, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate through two technologies how the selection of an upper limit of growth affects the correlation and causality of technology development measured with bibliometric data. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses Gompertz and Fisher-Pry curves to model the technological development of white light emitting diodes and flash memory, and show with extrapolation results from several bibliometric sources how a typical bias is caused in trend extrapolations. Findings The paper shows how drastic an effect the decision to set an upper bound has on trend extrapolations, to be used as a reference for applications. The paper recommends carefully examining the interconnection of actual development and bibliometric activity. Originality/value Despite increasing interest in modelling technological data using this method, reports rarely discuss basic assumptions and their effects on outcomes. Since trend extrapolations are applied more widely in different disciplines, the basic limitations of methods should be explicitly expressed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference50 articles.

1. Anonymous (2007), “Haitz's law”, Nat Photon, Vol. 1, January, pp. 23-23.

2. Armstrong, S.J. and Collopy, F. (1993), “Causal forces: Structuring knowledge for time-series extrapolation”, Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 103-115.

3. Arthur, B. (2009), The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves, Penguin Books, London.

4. Ayres, R.U. (1969), Technological Forecasting and Long-range Planning, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

5. Balconi, M. , Brusoni, S. and Orsenigo, L. (2009), “In defence of the linear model: an essay”, Research Policy, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 1-13.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3