Can mass media be an obstacle to rationing decisions? A case report from Portugal

Author:

Pinho MicaelaORCID,Dias Costa Eva

Abstract

Purpose Continuous introduction of advanced health technologies coupled with limited resources force governments to adopt rationing measures in all types of health systems. The mass media can influence the application of these measures by rising people and patients' expectations and demands for new forms of healing. This article intends to find evidence of this influence by reporting two recent cases which occurred in Portugal involving two innovative drugs, one for the treatment of hepatitis C and another for type I spinal muscular atrophy. The new drugs were not publicly funded despite promising excellent overall health outcomes because of their high cost and exaggerated burden on national health system (NHS). Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research was used to collect information conveyed by the conventional media and social networks. Findings After a strong dissemination through conventional and social media of the nonapproved treatments, the drugs swiftly garnered support among the public and triggered remarkable and relentless advocacy efforts. The findings of this paper suggest that society opinions and, by extension, the decision of policy-makers are very susceptible to the influence of the mass media. Practical implications New ways of sharing information are changing health research and public health. Social implications These stories raise complex tensions and important questions about resource-allocation decisions involving scientific research or innovative medicine. Societal preferences seem very vulnerable to information conveyed by the mass media. Originality/value This study is the first attempt to awaken attention to the influence that Portuguese mass media may exercise on future healthcare rationing decisions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference34 articles.

1. Procedural fairness in economic and social choice: evidence from a survey of voters;Journal of Economic Psychology,2001

2. Atkin, C. and Atkin, E. (1990), “Issues and initiative in communicating health information to the public”, in: Atkin, C. and Wallack, L. (Eds), Mass Communication and Public Health. London, SAGE, p. 38.

3. Using media to impact health policymaking: an integrative systematic review;Implementation Science,2017

4. Advocacy for public health: a primer;Journal Epidemiol Community Health,2004

5. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers;Philosophy and Public Affairs,1997

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3