A longitudinal analysis of data breaches

Author:

Posey Garrison Chlotia,Ncube Matoteng

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this research is to provide companies and consumers with information about the potential connections between data breach types and institutions. This study also aims to add to the body of knowledge about data breaches.Design/methodology/approachThis study analyzes a chronology of five years of data breaches. The data were classified and analyzed by breach and institution type, record size, and state. Multiple statistical tests were performed.FindingsBreach types stolen and exposed are statistically more likely to occur. Educational institutions are more likely to have a breach and it is more probable that educational breaches will be of type hacker or exposed. The proportion of insider incidents is smaller than the other breach types. The number of records breached is independent of institution and breach type.Research limitations/implicationsOnly those breaches with a specified number of records are included. The information used may have been updated after our analysis, usually a change in the number of records identified.Practical implicationsAdditional knowledge about characteristics of data breaches and the relationship between breach types and institution types will enable both businesses and consumers to be more effective in protecting sensitive information. Businesses will be able to create security budgets based on risk factors and consumers will be more aware of the risks of providing sensitive information.Originality/valueThis study provides a longitudinal analysis covering five years of data breaches and analyzes the relationship between five breach types and six types of institutions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Science and Operations Research,Business and International Management,Management Information Systems

Reference22 articles.

1. Baker, W., Hutton, A., Hylender, C., Novak, C., Porter, C., Sartin, B., Tippett, P. and Valentine, J. (2009), 2009 Data Breach Investigations Report, available at: http://verizonbusiness.com/resources/security/reports/2009_databreach_rp.pdf (accessed 12 August 2010).

2. Belsis, P., Kokolakis, S. and Kiountouzis, E. (2005), “Information systems security from a knowledge management perspective”, Information Management & Computer Security, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 189‐202.

3. CERT (2008), Governing for Enterprise Security, Computer Emergency Readiness Team, available at: http://cert.org/governance (accessed 12 August 2010).

4. Choi, N., Kim, D., Goo, J. and Whitmore, A. (2008), “Knowing is doing: an empirical validation of the relationship between managerial information security awareness and action”, Information Management & Computer Security, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 484‐501.

5. Curtin, M. and Ayres, L. (2008), “Using science to combat data loss: analyzing breaches by type and industry”, I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 569‐601.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3