Author:
Houmes Robert E.,MacArthur John B.,Stranahan Harriet
Abstract
PurposeStrategic cost structure choices determine how firms divide operating costs between fixed and variable components, and therefore have important implications for financial performance. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of operating leverage on equity Betas when managers have discretion over firms' cost structures.Design/methodology/approachUsing panel data for publicly listed trucking firms over years 1994‐2006, market model Betas are regressed on controls and alternatively measured proxies for operating leverage: degree of operating leverage, assets in place and percentage of company employed drivers.FindingsResults of this study generally show positively significant coefficients on all three operating leverage variables.Originality/valueOperating characteristics of many industries require that firms make substantial investments in long‐lived assets that result in high fixed costs (e.g. depreciation), and for these firms cost structure is exogenously or technologically constrained leaving managers with little discretion. In contrast to these types of firms, the authors examine the effect of operating leverage (OL) on Betas when managers have discretion over firms' cost structures. Trucking firms are a particularly interesting industry group for analyzing the impact of operating OL choices on Beta because distinct strategic cost structure choices are available to the management of trucking firms that result in various degrees of OL throughout the industry.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference45 articles.
1. Ball, R. and Brown, P. (1968), “An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 159‐78.
2. Basu, S. (1997), “The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 3‐37.
3. Beaver, W., Kettler, P. and Scholes, M. (1970), “The association between market determined and accounting determined risk measures”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 654‐82.
4. Bhandari, L.C. (1988), “Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: empirical evidence”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 507‐28.
5. Bildersee, J.S. (1975), “The association between a market‐determined measure of risk and alternative measures of risk”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 81‐98.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献