Author:
Benziane Yakoub,Law Siong Hook,Rosland Anitha,Abd Rahman Muhammad Daaniyall
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness of Aid for Trade (AfT) inflows and recommend new areas of interest concerning the initiative other than its effect on trade performance.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper reviews a sample of 55 studies over the past 11 years. Besides, this paper categorised the reviewed empirical studies into three groups: the works concentrating on the trade performance effect; the works focusing on other economic factors effect; and the works concerning the allocation effect of these inflows. This paper also offers a detailed analysis of the multiple empirical methods, sources of data, coverage of the countries and forms of AfT inflows used in the reviewed literature.
Findings
Key findings indicated that AfT has overall produced a successful impact as reported by most studies. Moreover, it has been highlighted that the effectiveness of AfT may differ relying on multiple indicators: the category of AfT disbursements; income of the recipient country; the recipient country's geographical region; the amount of aggregate AfT as well as its main categories; the policy regulation and institutional quality of the recipient country; and the degree of liberalisation in the recipient country.
Originality/value
This paper is special in that it is the first to publish a comprehensive narrative analysis of 55 empirical pieces of evidence on the effectiveness of AfT over the past 11 years. It is also the first paper to review the previous literature regarding the effectiveness of AfT inflows on other non-trade outcomes, as well as trade outcomes in one single study. The outcome of the survey reveals new areas of interest in the effectiveness of AfT aside from trade performance.
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Industrial relations
Reference84 articles.
1. Targeting aid for trade for impactful capacity-building in the least developed countries;Global Policy,2019
2. Alonso, A. (2016), “Aid for trade: Building productive and trade capacities in LDCs”, CDP Policy Review No. 1, United Nations Committee for Development Policy., available at: www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/CDP-review-2016-1.pdf
3. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations;The Review of Economic Studies,1991
4. Poverty effects from trade liberalisation in Argentina;The Journal of Development Studies,2008
5. Has the new aid for trade agenda been export effective? Evidence on the impact of US AfT allocations 1999-2008;International Studies Quarterly,2013
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献