Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a new and useful formulation of relevance.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is formulated as a conceptual argument. It makes the case for the utility of considering relevance to be function of use in creative processes.FindingsThere are several corollaries to formulating relevance as a function of use. These include the idea that objects by themselves cannot be relevant since use assumes interaction; the affordances of objects and how they are perceived can affect what becomes relevant but are not in themselves relevant; relevance is not an essential characteristic of objects; relevance is transient; potential relevance (what might be relevant in the future) can be distinguished from what is relevant in use and from what has been relevant in the past.Originality/valueThe paper shows that its new formulation of relevance brings improved conceptual and terminological clarity to the discourse about relevance in information science. It demonstrates that how relevance is articulated conceptually is important as its conceptualization can affect the ways that users are able to make use of information systems and, by extension, how information systems can facilitate or disable the co-production of creative outcomes. The paper also usefully expands investigative opportunities by suggesting relevance and creativity are interrelated.
Reference48 articles.
1. Bean, C.A. and Green, R. (2001), “Relevance relationships”, in Bean, C.A. and Green, R. (Eds), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, NL.
2. The concept of relevance in IR;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2003
3. Buckland, M.K. (2017), “Document theory”, in Hjørland, B. (Ed.), ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-425, available at: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/document (accessed 10 April 2022).