Genre fiction readers: a quantitative exploration of provided construct ratings

Author:

Birdi Briony

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to adapt a repertory grid technique to investigate fiction readers’ attitudes and beliefs, with a specific focus on minority ethnic fiction. Design/methodology/approach – The study required participants (n=36) to rate on a seven-point Likert scale a series of 16 provided constructs, using ten main elements, namely, the reader of ten fiction genres. Statistical tests investigated participant agreement across construct ratings, where on average fiction readers are rated on a construct continuum, and the extent to which public library work experience affected participants’ perceptions. Findings – Findings were revealed regarding the perceived characteristics of the readers of ten fiction genres, including minority ethnic fiction. The readers of Asian and Black British fiction were similarly rated, but certain exceptions were also noted which had not been reported in previous research. Although intraclass correlations indicated that ratings were consistent for the more established fiction genres, there was little agreement regarding minority fiction. Research limitations/implications – The research was potentially limited by the ethnic homogeneity of the sample population and the gender imbalance of same, and (in some cases) a lack of knowledge of minority fiction genres. It was felt that the repertory grid was an effective technique via which to build a rich profile of the fiction reader. Practical implications – This research could inform the development of fiction collections, and its detailed examination of fiction reader profiles could be adapted in three specific ways, as described in the paper. Originality/value – Little previous research has been conducted to differentiate between readers of different fiction genres, and less still for those of minority ethnic fiction genres.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference49 articles.

1. Banister, P. , Burman, E. and Parker, I. (1994), Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide, Open University Press, Buckingham.

2. Bannister, D. (Ed.) (1977), New Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory, Academic Press, London.

3. Batty, D. (2009), “The right person for the job”, The Guardian, 16 September, available at: www.theguardian.com/society/2009/sep/16/public-service-initiatives-disadvantaged-groups (accessed 14 April 2014).

4. Birdi, B. (2010), “We are here because you were there: minority ethnic genre fiction in UK public libraries”, paper presented at the Joint Session of the Literacy and Reading and Library Services to Multicultural Populations Sections in Gothenburg, Sweden at the 76th World Library and Information Congress, 14 August, available at: www.ifla.org/en/ifla76 (accessed 14 April 2014).

5. Birdi, B. (2011), “Investigating fiction reader characteristics using personal construct theory”, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 63 Nos 2/3, pp. 275-294.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards a new sociological model of fiction reading;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2018-07-30

2. The supply, promotion and readership of minority ethnic English language fiction in the UK: a review of the literature;Knjižnica: revija za področje bibliotekarstva in informacijske znanosti;2016-10-01

3. How we missed the boat: reading scholarship and the field of LIS;New Library World;2015-10-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3