Professional value and ethical self-regulation in the development of modern librarianship

Author:

Hansson Joacim

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to make a contribution to the theoretical understanding of documents and documentary agency in society through examples from a defined institutional and professional setting; and second, to create an understanding for the role of ethical codes in the process of defining and developing modern librarianship. Design/methodology/approach This study analyses the role of documentation carrying content of professional ethics in the formulation of modern librarianship. This is done through a series of example documents of various kinds, such as founding charters, peer handbooks and ethical codes systematically analysed through the use of document theory and theory on institutional change. Findings The findings of this study suggest that documents pronouncing ethical self-regulation within librarianship play a primarily legitimising role in situations where new types of libraries emerge or when libraries adapt to social change. The study proposes legitimacy as a key aspect of documentality, thus supplementing the established understanding of the concept. Originality/value This study is the first to analyse the role of ethical codes in libraries using document theory. It brings new knowledge to the role of ethical self-regulation in librarianship over time and in different institutional contexts. In suggesting a developed definition of documentality, it contributes to the theoretical understanding of the role of documents and documentation in institutions and in society at large.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference57 articles.

1. American Library Association (n.d.), “Code of ethics”, available at: ala.org/advocacy/proethics/codeofethics/codeethics

2. Between professional field norms and environmental change impetuses: a comparative study of change processes in public libraries;Library and Information Science Research,1999

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Privacy Paradox in Industry 4.0: A review of library information services and data protection;South African Journal of Information Management;2024-08-29

2. Evolving legitimacy of the public library in the 21st century;Journal of Documentation;2024-06-03

3. An Act of Balance;Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift;2024-05-29

4. Assessment of corporate social responsibility practices in selected public libraries in South-West and North-Central, Nigeria;International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility;2024-02-17

5. The Value of Belonging: A Comparison of Professional Organizations' Membership Benefits;portal: Libraries and the Academy;2023-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3