Role of gatekeeping on Facebook in creating information benefits for vulnerable, pregnant women in the rural United States

Author:

Potnis Devendra DilipORCID,Halladay Macy

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate why and how gatekeepers on social networking sites (SNS) create what types of information benefits for gated, vulnerable, pregnant women in the rural United States.Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative study adopts “network gatekeeping” as a theoretical lens to implement a combination of deductive and inductive qualitative approaches for analyzing in-depth interviews with members and administrators of a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) Group on Facebook with a membership of over 500 pregnant women in rural Appalachia in the United States.FindingsThe VBAC group administrators' (a) vision of transforming the existing doctor-centric birth culture to a more mother-centric birth culture in the rural United States, (b) expertise and experience in healthcare and (c) valuing scientific, evidence-based information lead to recurring, authoritative but evolving manifestations of combinations of nine network gatekeeping mechanisms. Implementations of nine network gatekeeping mechanisms (i.e. localization, infrastructure, cost effect, channeling, censorship, regulation, editorial, user-interaction and value adding mechanisms) help VBAC group administrators control interactions and information on the group, thereby creating 16 information benefits for the gated, vulnerable women before, during and after pregnancy.Originality/valueThis sociological study of network gatekeeping posits and proves an “information value chain” (i.e. Why to create information benefits? – How to create information benefits? – What types of information benefits?) for vulnerable, pregnant women on Facebook. Rarely any study shows the role of network gatekeeping mechanisms in implementing an information value chain.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference74 articles.

1. Comparing decisions on releases by TV and newspaper gatekeepers;Journalism Quarterly,1989

2. Health status of vulnerable populations;Annual Review of Public Health,1994

3. Inner-city gatekeepers: an exploratory survey of their information use environment;Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1999

4. Appalachian Regional Commission (2017), “Appalachian region endures dramatic health challenges compared with nation, new research shows”, available at: https://www.arc.gov/news/appalachian-region-endures-dramatic-health-challenges-compared-with-nation-new-research-shows/ (accessed 18 July 2020).

5. Service innovation in the digital age: key contributions and future directions;MIS Quarterly,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Activism or slacktivism?;Journal of Language and Politics;2023-02-16

2. Seven information practices for alleviating information vulnerability;Journal of Documentation;2021-11-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3