Online or in-store: unravelling consumer’s channel choice motives

Author:

Haridasan Anu C.,Fernando Angeline Gautami

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare online and in-store shoppers motivations based on product type. Design/methodology/approach Means-end approach was used to extract motivational factors that drive shoppers channel choice for hedonic and utilitarian products. A total of 100 respondents were interviewed using laddering technique. Hierarchical virtual maps were constructed to determine values associated with attributes and consequences identified by the consumer. Findings Shopping motivations differed for online and in-store shoppers based on product type. Variety, value for money and delivery were important attributes for online shoppers. In-store shoppers looked for social interaction and personalized attention. Convenience, affordability and gratification were unique online consequences, while nostalgia and loyalty benefits were specific to in-store hedonic purchases. Self-confidence, availability of wider choices and in-store shopping experience were the values sought for hedonic products. Control of shopping experience was the desired value for utilitarian purchases irrespective of channels. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to shopping motivation research by comparing motives of online and in-store shoppers for hedonic and utilitarian products. Practical implications Retailers need to enhance online trust and strengthen in-store customer service for hedonic products. They should also work on the online delivery capabilities and in-store personalized services for utilitarian purchases. Originality/value Prior research on deconstructing channel choice motivations based on product type is sparse. This paper uses hierarchy of means-end elements to illustrate attributes and consequences that drive consumer motives and values.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference100 articles.

1. Determinants of purchasing intention for fashion luxury goods in the Italian market: a laddering approach;Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal,2011

2. Consumer self-regulation in a retail environment;Journal of Retailing,1995

3. Generation Y female consumer decision-making styles;International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management,2003

4. Does variety seeking vary between hedonic and utilitarian products? The role of attribute type;Journal of Consumer Behaviour,2017

5. Bencic, E. (2017), “David Jones to sell electronics…again”, available at: www.applianceretailer.com.au/2017/11/david-jones-sell-electronicsagain/ (accessed 7 November 2017).

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3