Selecting hotel staff: why best practice does not always work

Author:

Lockyer Cliff,Scholarios Dora

Abstract

This paper considers the nature of “best practice” recruitment and selection in the hotel sector. Data from a sample of Scottish hotels indicate a reliance on informal methods, particularly in smaller hotels. In larger and chain hotels, structured procedures, including references, application forms and panel interviews, are evident, but, here too, these methods seem inadequate for dealing with recruitment and quality problems, especially in meeting temporary staffing needs. Case study evidence contrasts two alternative strategies: a successful holistic strategy based on management of social processes important for selection, and a more conventional bureaucratic strategy. Each strategy depends on a complex interrelationship between business and labour market considerations, the ownership and management structure of the hotel, and the tenure and experience of those responsible for selection. This evidence indicates that, for the hotel industry, the holistic strategy is an alternative to conventional notions

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Reference44 articles.

1. Annual Business Inquiry (2000), Revised Results, ABI, Newport.

2. Baum, T. (1995), Managing Human Resources in the European Tourism and Hospitality Industry: A Strategic Approach, Chapman & Hall, London.

3. Berger, F. and Ghei, A. (1995), “Employment tests: a facet of hospitality hiring”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 28‐35.

4. Croney, P. (1988), “An analysis of human resource management in the UK hotel industry”, Proceedings of The International Association of Hotel Management Schools Symposium, Leeds Polytechnic, Leeds.

5. Dany, F. and Torchy, V. (1994), “Recruitment and selection in Europe: policies, practices and methods”, in Brewster, C. and Hegewisch, A. (Eds), Policy and Practice in European Human Resource Management: The Price Waterhouse Cranfield Survey, Routledge, London, pp. 68‐88.

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3