A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism

Author:

Timur Seldjan,Getz Donald

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine the current network of inter‐relationships of stakeholders representing government, the community and the tourism and hospitality industry, and their perceptions of critical stakeholders in destination development.Design/methodology/approachWhile the network analysis enabled examination of the interconnectedness of stakeholders, the stakeholder approach identified the critical stakeholders in destination development. These two approaches helped determine how the existing relationship structures of destination stakeholders might influence sustainable destination development.FindingsThe destination marketing/management organizations (DMOs) and stakeholders with access to or possession of critical resources have the highest centrality in urban destinations. In all three clusters, local government and DMOs are perceived to hold the greatest legitimacy and power over others in destination development. It is also found that there is a lack of “bridges” between the three clusters of industry, government and the community.Research limitations/implicationsThe study demonstrates the use of a network analysis methodology as a potential tool for researchers and managers in examining destination stakeholder relationships.Practical implicationsDMOs, hotels and attractions stakeholders have the most crucial roles in achieving inter‐stakeholder collaboration for sustainable destination development, particularly because the many and diverse industry actors trust or depend on them.Originality/valueThere are very few studies that have applied both network and stakeholder perspectives to destinations to examine the structure of inter‐stakeholder relationships and the potential influence of this relational structure on sustainable destination development.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Reference45 articles.

1. Barley, S., Freeman, J. and Hybels, R. (1992), “Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology”, in Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. (Eds), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

2. Blackshaw, T. and Long, J. (1998), “A critical examination of the advantages of investigating community and leisure from a social network perspective”, Leisure Studies, Vol. 17, pp. 233‐48.

3. Carroll, A.B. (1993), Business and Society, South‐Western, Cincinnati, OH.

4. Cobb, M. (1988), “Influence and exchange networks among tourism oriented business in four Michigan communities”, doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

5. Costenbader, E. and Valente, T.W. (2003), “The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled”, Social Networks, No. 25, pp. 283‐307.

Cited by 259 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3