Assessment in North American research libraries: a preliminary report card

Author:

Hiller Steve,Kyrillidou Martha,Self Jim

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to report on the first phase of a two‐year project sponsored by the Association of Research Libraries, “Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment”.Design/methodology/approachThis paper reports on the project, which is intended to provide libraries with the knowledge and understanding necessary to select and apply appropriate measurement techniques, and to use assessment data in decision making. The focus of this effort is on practical and sustainable approaches to effective assessment. The paper is particularly interested in the successful application of assessment within different organizational cultures and moving library assessment from a project‐based approach to a more programmatic, integrated, and sustainable operation within libraries.FindingsThe findings of the study indicate that all the ARL libraries in Phase I are developing a stronger understanding of the value of assessment and library leadership supports this movement. It finds that there are staff in each library who have good research methodology skills, although they may not be involved in assessment efforts. It reveals that areas that did not receive a passing grade in most libraries included resource allocation, sustainability, prioritizing needs, choosing the appropriate assessment method, using data for improvement, and communicating assessment results.Originality/valueThe paper provides useful information on a project intended to help librarians in decision making.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference10 articles.

1. Blixrud, J.C. (2003), “Mainstreaming new measures”, ARL Bimonthly Report, Nos 230/231, October/December, pp. 1‐8, available at www.arl.org/newsltr/230/mainstreaming.html.

2. Cook, C., Heath, F., Kyrillidou, M. and Webster, D. (2001), “The forging of consensus: a methodological approach to service quality assessment”, paper presented at the 4th Northumbria International Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, August, available at: www.libqual.org/documents/admin/cookforging.pdf.

3. Hiller, S. and Self, J. (2004), “From measurement to management: using statistics wisely in planning and decision‐making”, Library Trends, Vol. 54 No. 1, Summer, special issue on Organization Development in Libraries, pp. 29‐155.

4. Kyrillidou, M. (2005), “Library assessment as a collaborative enterprise”, Resource Sharing and Information Networks, Vol. 18 Nos 1/2, special issue on Creative Collaborations: Libraries within Their Institutions and Beyond, pp. 73‐87, available at: www.libqual.org/documents/admin/kyrillidou_haworth_sept72004.pdf.

5. Stoffle, C., Renaud, R. and Veldof, J. (1996), “Choosing our futures”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 213‐25.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3