LibQUAL+TM in Iran: a subgroup analysis by gender

Author:

Hariri Nadjla,Afnani Farideh

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the service quality of the central library of Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IUMS) from the viewpoints of female and male users of the library.Design/methodology/approachThe study was done using a LibQUAL+™ survey, consisting of 22 core questions. The research sample included 361 users of the library and the results were interpreted on the basis of gap analysis. The mean values of gap scores for female and male users were compared statistically.FindingsThe mean score for the overall adequacy gap for women was 0.08 while this score for men was −0.08. The overall and dimensions superiority gap for both genders were negative. Statistical analysis did not show significant differences between mean values of gap scores for female and male users. The desired level of service quality, as in most LibQUAL+™ surveys in non‐Iranian libraries, was not met by this library.Practical implicationsThe similarity in some results of LibQUAL+™ in different socio‐cultural contexts implies that perhaps customer expectations from library services are somehow global.Originality/valueThe paper shows that the translated version of LibQUAL+™ , can be reliably implemented in different countries. Furthermore, though LibQUAL+™ is a web‐based survey, in the case of the countries where ICT facilities are not still completely established, its printed version can reliably be utilized.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference18 articles.

1. Altman, E. and Hernon, P. (1998), “Service quality and customer satisfaction do matter”, American Libraries, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 53‐5.

2. Association of Research Libraries/Texas A&M University (ARL) (2005), “LibQUAL+™ 2005 survey results – University of Ulster”, available at: http://library.ulster.ac.uk/libqual/complete_libqual.pdf.

3. Association of Research Libraries/Texas A&M University (ARL) (2006), “LibQUAL+™ Spring 2006 survey results – Glasgow University Library”, available at: http://www.lib.gla.ac.uk/libqual/2006/2006resultsfullreport.pdf.

4. Calvert, P.J. (2001), “International variations in measuring customer expectations”, Library Trends, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 732‐57.

5. Cook, C. and Thompson, B. (2001), “Psychometric properties of scores from the Web‐based LibQUAL+™ study of perceptions of library service quality”, Library Trends, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 585‐604.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3