Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to dissect the multifaceted impact of ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, specifically within civil engineering testing and calibration laboratories. To achieve this, it intends to explore several key objectives: identifying the prominent benefits of accreditation to laboratory performance, understanding the advantages conferred through participation in proficiency testing schemes, assessing the role of accreditation in enhancing laboratory competitiveness, examining the primary challenges encountered during the accreditation process, investigating any discernible adverse effects of accreditation on laboratory performance and evaluating whether the financial cost of accreditation justifies the resultant profitability.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a qualitative approach through semi-structured interviews with 23 industry professionals—including technical managers, quality managers, external auditors and clients. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke’s six-stage paradigm, was utilized to interpret the data, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the accreditation’s impact.FindingsFindings reveal that accreditation significantly enhances operational processes, fosters quality awareness and facilitates continuous improvement, contributing to greater client satisfaction. In addition, standardized operations and rigorous quality controls further result in enhanced performance metrics, such as staff capability and measurement accuracy. However, the study also uncovers the challenges of accreditation, including high resource costs and bureaucratic hurdles that can inhibit innovation and slow routine operations. Importantly, the research underscores that the impact of accreditation on profitability is not universal, but contingent upon various factors like sector-specific regulations and market demand. The study also highlights sector-specific variations in the role of accreditation as a marketing tool and differing perceptions of its value among clients. It further emphasizes the psychological stress of high-stakes evaluations during audits.Originality/valueThis study represents the first in-depth investigation into the impact of ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation on civil engineering testing and calibration laboratories, directly contributing to the enhancement of their quality and operational standards. Providing actionable insights for laboratories, it underscores the importance of weighing accreditation costs and benefits and the necessity for a tailored approach to the unique market and regulatory landscapes they operate in.
Reference53 articles.
1. ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation: between the desired gains and the reality;Quality Assurance Journal,2010
2. Adams, W.C. (2015), “Conducting semi‐structured interviews”, in Newcomer, K.E., Hatry, H.P. and Wholey, J.S. (Eds), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 1st ed., Wiley, pp. 492-505, doi: 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.
3. ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 lab management system effectiveness verification by using quantitative approach;Gas,2021
4. ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025: which is the best option for a laboratory of metrology? The Portuguese experience;International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,2017
5. Scientific underpinnings and background to standards and accreditation in digital forensics;Digital Investigation,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献