Abstract
PurposeThis paper introduces the problematic of the SBP modeling. Our objective is to provide a conceptual analysis related to the concept of SBP. This facilitates, on the one hand, easier understanding by business analysts and end-users, and one the other hand, the integration of the new specific concepts relating to the SBP/BPM-KM domains into the BPMN meta-model (OMG, 2013).Design/methodology/approachWe propose a rigorous characterization of SBP (Sensitive Business Processes) (which distinguishes it from classic, structured and conventional BPs). Secondly, we propose a multidimensional classification of SBP modeling aspects and requirements to develop expressive, comprehensive and rigorous models. Besides, we present an in-depth study of the different modeling approaches and languages, in order to analyze their expressiveness and their abil-ity to perfectly and explicitly represent the new specific requirements of SBP modeling. In this study, we choose the better one positioned nowadays, BPMN 2.0, as the best suited standard for SBP representation. Finally, we propose a semantically rich conceptualization of a SBP organized in core ontology.FindingsWe defined a rigorous conceptual specification for this type of BP, organized in a multi-perspective formal ontology, the Core Ontology of Sensitive Business Processes (COSBP). This reference ontology will be used to define a generic BP meta-model (BPM4KI) further specifying SBPs. The objective is to obtain an enriched consensus modeling covering all generic concepts, semantic relationships and properties needed for the exploitation of SBPs, known as core modeling.Originality/valueThis paper introduces the problem of conceptual analysis of SBPs for (crucial) knowledge identification and management. These processes are highly complex and knowledge-intensive. The originality of this contribution lies in the multi-dimensional approach we have adopted for SBP modeling as well as the definition of a Core Ontology of Sensitive Business Processes (COSBP) which is very useful to extend the BPMN notation for knowledge management.
Reference67 articles.
1. Workflow-embedded organizational memory access: the DECOR project;IJCAI’2001 Workshop on Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories,2001
2. Ben Hassen, M., Turki, M. and Gargouri, F. (2017a), “Sensitive business processes representation: a multi-dimensional comparative analysis of business process modeling formalisms”, in Shishkov, B. (Ed.), Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD), Springer, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 257, pp. 83-118, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57222-2_5.
3. Modeling dynamic aspects of sensitive business processes for knowledge localization,2017
4. Extending sensitive business process modeling with functional dimension for knowledge identification,2017
5. Towards extending business process modeling Formalisms with information and knowledge dimensions,2017