Author:
Nicomedes Williams L.,Mesquita Renato C.,Moreira Fernando J.S.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to solve both eigenvalue and boundary value problems coming from the field of quantum mechanics through the application of meshless methods, particularly the one known as meshless local Petrov‐Galerkin (MLPG).Design/methodology/approachRegarding eigenvalue problems, the authors show how to apply MLPG to the time‐independent Schrödinger equation stated in three dimensions. Through a special procedure, the numerical integration of weak forms is carried out only for internal nodes. The boundary conditions are enforced through a collocation method. The final result is a generalized eigenvalue problem, which is readily solved for the energy levels. An example of boundary value problem is described by the time‐dependent nonlinear Schrödinger equation. The weak forms are again stated only for internal nodes, whereas the same collocation scheme is employed to enforce the boundary conditions. The nonlinearity is dealt with by a predictor‐corrector scheme.FindingsResults show that the combination of MLPG and a collocation scheme works very well. The numerical results are compared to those provided by analytical solutions, exhibiting good agreement.Originality/valueThe flexibility of MLPG is made explicit. There are different ways to obtain the weak forms, and the boundary conditions can be enforced through a number of ways, the collocation scheme being just one of them. The shape functions used to approximate the solution can incorporate modifications that reflect some feature of the problem, like periodic boundary conditions. The value of this work resides in the fact that problems from other areas of electromagnetism can be attacked by the very same ideas herein described.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications
Reference6 articles.
1. Atluri, S. and Shen, S. (2002), “The meshless local Petrov‐Galerkin method: a simple & less‐costly alternative to the finite‐element and boundary element methods”, CMES, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 11‐51.
2. Dehgan, M. and Mirzaei, D. (2008), “The meshless local Petrov‐Galerkin (MLPG) method for the generalized two‐dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation”, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, Vol. 32, pp. 747‐56.
3. Jun, S. (2004), “Meshfree implementation for the real‐space electronic‐structure calculation of crystalline solids”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 59, pp. 1909‐23.
4. Liu, G.R. (2002), Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
5. Nicomedes, W.L., Mesquita, R.C. and Moreira, F.J.S. (2009), “A local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method in 2D electromagnetic wave scattering, and a meshless discretization approach”, Proceedings of the SBMO/IEEE MTT‐S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference, pp. 133‐7, available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献