Abstract
PurposeCOVID-19 and its accompanying lockdowns were arguably the most traumatic events of our times. This paper investigates the impact of COVID-19 on market efficiency.Design/methodology/approachI analyze all publicly traded U.S. equities for 2014–September 2021, using intraday data from TAQ, TRACE, I/B/E/S and Capital IQ and daily data from CRSP, Thomson Reuters, Compustat, CRSP-Compustat Merged Database and FRED, using a controlled contrast between absolute abnormal returns for relevant halfhours versus absolute abnormal returns in control halfhours, measured by the negative of the coefficient of the fixed effect of the interaction between the indicator variable, and as the case may be, ticker and/or time period of interest, in the regression of halfhour-level absolute abnormal returns on tickers, months and interactions.FindingsUsing two separate objective, systematic, independent and ordinal per se measures of market efficiency based upon market reactions separately to key developments and earnings announcements, I find that U.S. equities markets were statistically and economically significantly less efficient during the first two-three months of the COVID-19 lockdowns.Practical implicationsEfficient capital markets provide substantial social benefits and are a sine qua non for the democratization of markets and the protection of investors, and constitute a critical mission of regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).Social implicationsThe impact on market efficiency provides one critical input into the social cost-benefit analysis of public health policy and that of government interventions in general.Originality/valueThere has been no previous work done on the systematic and objective characterization of the impact of COVID-19 and associated lockdowns on market efficiency.
Reference36 articles.
1. Coronavirus (COVID-19) — an epidemic or pandemic for financial markets;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance,2020
2. What's in a ‘China’ name? A test of investor attention hypothesis;Financial Management,2012
3. Ball, R. (2017), “Fama, Fisher, Jensen, and Roll (1969) — retrospective comments”, in Cochrane, J. and Moskowitz, T. (Eds), The Fama Portfolio, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
4. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers;Journal of Accounting Research,1968
5. Known unknowns versus unknown unknowns, and actual versus statistical significance;SSRN,2024
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献