A framework for benchmarking product sustainability efforts
Author:
Brockhaus Sebastian,Fawcett Stan,Kersten Wolfgang,Knemeyer Michael
Abstract
Purpose
– Regulatory pressure, consumer awareness, and the quest for competitive advantage place sustainable products in today’s decision-making spotlight. The purpose of this paper is to explore supply chain dynamics as they relate to sustainable product programs and to empirically develop a framework to align efforts across the supply chain to bring sustainable products to market.
Design/methodology/approach
– Grounded in systems design, stakeholder theory, and the theory of planned behavior, the authors conduct an inductive empirical study of 28 European and US companies.
Findings
– The authors make three contributions. First, the authors identify six dimensions of product sustainability, which map to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol’s sustainability scope model. Second, the authors model relational dynamics using systems diagrams to provide a framework that: first, communicates a common understanding of product sustainability; and second, facilitates tradeoff analysis. Third, the authors elaborate behaviors needed to reduce ambiguity and compliance costs.
Practical implications
– Managers can use the framework to assess product sustainability and evaluate tradeoffs across product dimensions and supply chain participants. Using this insight, managers can design sustainable product programs that engage supply chain participants.
Social implications
– By identifying dimensions, defining costs, and uncovering tradeoffs, managers can more effectively implement sustainable product programs.
Originality/value
– The framework provides a much needed source of clarity to mitigate role ambiguity, reduce compliance costs, and promote collaborative behavior in bringing sustainable products to market.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference137 articles.
1. Ameta, G.
,
Rachuri, S.
,
Fiorentini, X.
,
Mani, M.
,
Fenves, S.J.
,
Lyons, K.W.
and
Sriram, R.D.
(2009), “Extending the notion of quality from physical metrology to information and sustainability”,
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 1-14. 2. Agle, B.R.
,
Donaldson, T.
,
Freeman, R.E.
,
Jensen, M.C.
,
Mitchell, R.K.
and
Wood, D.J.
(2008), “Dialogue: toward superior stakeholder theory”,
Business Ethics Quarterly
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 153-190. 3. Ajzen, I.
(1991), “The theory of planned behavior”,
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 179-211. 4. Ajzen, I.
(2002), “Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior”,
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 665-683. 5. Albino, V.
,
Balice, A.
and
Dangelico, R.M.
(2009), “Environmental strategies and green product development: an overview on sustainability-driven companies”,
Business Strategy and the Environment
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 83-96.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|