Author:
Mihail Dimitrios M.,Mac Links Myra,Sarvanidis Sofoklis
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the nexus of high‐performance work systems (HPWS) with corporate change that leads to enhanced performance.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses a case study method and analyzes the impact of a HPWS, adopted at a German medical technology company, on corporate turnaround and performance outcomes. In the present study, conducting in‐depth interviews with the social partners of corporate change, the authors investigate how leadership, competition forces and employee relations interacted with a bundle of high‐performance work practices led the company to massive changes in production with noticeable performance outcomes.FindingsThe analysis lends support to the HPWS approach that links certain high‐commitment work practices to corporate changes and enhanced performance outcomes such as rising employee productivity and sales over the last decade.Practical implicationsThe study pinpoints key factors that could optimally be used as a best practice framework for change management leading to corporate turnaround in a highly volatile world economy.Social implicationsThe HPWS approach, facilitating corporate turnaround, underlines the importance of social partnership for modern corporations to handle groundbreaking changes and survive the fierce competition in global markets.Originality/valueUsing a case study method, the analysis lends some support to the HPWS perspective that links high‐commitment work practices to enhanced corporate performance.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference124 articles.
1. Apospori, E., Nikandrou, I., Brewster, C. and Papalexandris, N. (2008), “HRM and organizational performance in Northern and Southern Europe”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 19 No. 7, pp. 1187‐207.
2. Appelbaum, E., Berg, P. and Kalleberg, A. (2000), Manufacturing Advantage: Why High‐Performance Work Systems Pay Off, ILR – Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
3. Armenakis, A., Fredenberger, W., Cherones, L. and Field, H. (1995), “Symbolic actions used by business turnaround change agents”, Academy of Management Journal, special issue, pp. 229‐34.
4. Armstrong, M. (2009), Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 11th ed., Kogan Page, London.
5. Arogyaswamy, K., Barker, V. and Yasai‐Ardekani, M. (1995), “Firm turnarounds: an integrative two‐stage model”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 493‐525.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献