Author:
Chen Yu,Rezaee Zabihollah
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the important role played by corporate governance in de facto International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) convergence, and to provide empirical evidence that audit quality mediates the degree of IFRS convergence.Design/methodology/approachThe paper develops a model showing the role of corporate governance in converging national accounting standards with the IFRS, and empirically tests the model using a sample of Chinese listed companies with B‐shares. Both analysis of variance and multiple regressions are employed to test the hypotheses.FindingsEffective internal corporate governance helps companies to be more aligned with IFRS and thus provide high quality financial information. Furthermore, audit quality as an external governance factor mediates the relationship between internal corporate governance and IFRS convergence.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper extends research findings, as shown in the literature, by showing the role of corporate governance in the IFRS convergence, especially the mediating effect of audit quality. In addition to accounting standards, global convergence of auditing standards and corporate governance is imperative if de facto convergence of accounting standards is to be achieved.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the effect of corporate governance and the interaction between internal and external corporate governance in achieving IFRS convergence, which has been largely ignored in the literature. Based on the results, the paper proposes an explanation for the mixed results shown in the literature.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Accounting,Management Information Systems
Reference50 articles.
1. AICPA (2008), “How widespread is the adoption of IFRS around the world?”, available at: www.ifrs.com/ifrs_faqs.html#q3 (accessed September 2, 2009).
2. Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A. and Reeb, D.M. (2004), “Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 315‐42.
3. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The moderator‐mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, p. 1173.
4. Barth, M.E. and Kallapur, S. (1996), “The effects of cross‐sectional scale differences on regression results in empirical accounting research”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 527‐67.
5. Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R. and Lang, M.H. (2008), “International accounting standards and accounting quality”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 467‐98.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献