An analysis of attributes that impact adoption of audit software

Author:

Razi Muhammad A.,Madani Haider H.

Abstract

PurposeAudit software and IT‐based auditing are widely used in developed countries and is an emerging trend in other parts of the world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the adoption of audit software by Saudi industries. This research extends current knowledge by focusing on technology adoptions issues and comparing the results with the results of past adoptions in Western industries.Design/methodology/approachDemographic and psychometric factors related to adoption decision were identified and incorporated in the research model. A web‐based survey instrument was used to collect data. The reliability score of each construct was measured with Cronbach's alpha. Results from descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression were used to examine the influence of demographic and psychometric factors on adoption decision.FindingsContrary to existing literature, this study shows that external pressure has no impact on the adoption decision. In addition, similar to earlier findings, the results showed that Company Readiness and Perceived Benefits are reasonably good predictors of Adoption Intention of audit software.Research limitations/implicationsContrary to current evidence, this research points to the result that external pressure has no impact on the adoption decision. This leads to an interesting research avenue to explore the reasons why companies in Saudi Arabia do not see external pressure as a significant factor behind decision to adopt certain technology.Originality/valueThis article extends current technology adoption knowledge by providing a comparison of adoptions in the west and in Saudi Arabia. Results of this research can assist software adopters with adoption decisions and vendors in software implementation, sales, and service in Saudi Arabia.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Accounting,Management Information Systems

Reference68 articles.

1. AASB (2001), Auditing Guidance Statement AGS 1060 Computer Assisted Audit Techniques, Australian Auditing Standards Board, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.

2. AASB (2004), Auditing and Assurance Standard AUS 406 – The Auditor's Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks, Australian Auditing Standards Board, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.

3. Abbas, A. and Paul, S. (1985), “Managerial decision styles and work satisfaction in Saudi Arabia”, Management Decision, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 33‐43.

4. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice‐Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

5. Al‐Gahtani, S.S. (2008), “Testing for the applicability of the TAM model in the Arabic context: exploring an extended TAM with three moderating factors”, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 1‐26.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3