Cultural consumption and souvenirs: an ethical framework

Author:

Brennan Linda,Savage Theresa

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose guidelines for business enterprises engaging with indigenous communities to protect their intellectual property rights, particularly indigenous art works produced for the souvenir industry.Design/methodology/approachLiterature on indigenous art and souvenirs demonstrating exploitation of indigenous communities’ intellectual property was facilitated by a lack of knowledge of how to otherwise behave. The proposed guidelines for commercial entities wishing to engage ethically with indigenous communities draws on international exemplars.FindingsA twelve‐point framework for ethical commerce in indigenous souvenirs between indigenous communities and businesses is proposed to ensure populations lacking economic and social power are not disenfranchised by limited experience in a market society.Social implicationsThe proposed guidelines contribute to achieving reconciliation between mainstream and indigenous people in various countries throughout the world.Originality/valueThis paper assists development of guidelines enabling ethical decision‐making in the souvenir industry applying a critical approach to the principles of corporate responsibility.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference81 articles.

1. American Anthropological Association (AAA) (2009), “Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association”, available at: www.aaanet.org/cs_upload/issues/policy‐advocacy/27668_1.pdf (accessed February 7, 2009).

2. Agrawal, A. (1995), “Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge”, Development and Change, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 413‐39.

3. Altman, J., Hunter, B., Ward, S. and Wright, F. (2002), “The indigenous visual arts industry. Competition and consumer issues for indigenous Australians, a report to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) by CAEPR”, ACCC, Canberra.

4. Apte, M. (1987), “Ethnic humor versus ‘sense of humor’: an American sociocultural dilemma”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 27‐41.

5. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2009), “ACCC institutes against seller of Aboriginal art for misleading representations”, ACCC, available at: www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/877295 (accessed June 26, 2009).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3