A personal history of digital libraries

Author:

Lesk Michael

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present a personal view of the development of digital libraries, starting with the original vision of 1945 and describing how it came to the dominance of online searching and reading that it has today.Design/methodology/approachProgress in digital libraries is described in four areas: technical, economic, legal and social issues. Originally technological obstacles were dominant, but they have generally been overcome by progress in computers, networks, and algorithms. Economic issues have also faded, although “open access” questions still bedevil us. Surprisingly, libraries are now faced with more serious legal obstacles than first expected; no one today can start a digital library effort without thinking about copyright. Social issues are likely to be the next set of challenges.FindingsThe transformation of searching and reading has been almost complete. Scholars in scientific disciplines, in particular, often function quite well with only rare visits to a library to read physical books. Even in the area of entertainment reading, it can be seen that the e‐reader devices now dominating. These results have been a combination of new research results and new commercial activities, with perhaps less progress by publishers and libraries than one might have hoped.Originality/valueThe development of digital libraries has been a complex mixture of change: there are ideas which were invented long before users or companies were ready for them, and other ideas (such as search engines) which appeared suddenly when opportunities arose. The complexities of technology, economics, law and society are still in the process of being understood as they either enable or block new services. However, looking back, it can be seen that essentially the entire vision of 1945 is in sight and other large improvements in complex systems and how they are helped or impeded in their progress may be learned from this story.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference37 articles.

1. Avram, H. (1968), The MARC Pilot Project, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, available at: http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED029663.pdf (accessed 29 July 2012).

2. Bellah, J.W. and Goldbeck, W. (1962), The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, screenplay, Paramount Pictures and John Ford Productions, Hollywood, CA.

3. Berger, E. (2011), “Preserving the Benny Carter and Benny Goodman Collections: a project funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation”, available at: www.rutgers‐newark.rutgers.edu/∼danadml/IJS/MellonProject/ (accessed 29 July 2012).

4. Bush, V. (1945), “As we may think”, Atlantic Monthly, July, pp. 101‐8.

5. Bush, V. (1967), Science Is Not Enough, William Morrow & Co., New York, NY.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Issues with Journal Issues: Let Journals Be Digital Libraries;Publications;2023-02-09

2. Intellectual Property Challenges in Digital Library Environments;Research Anthology on Collaboration, Digital Services, and Resource Management for the Sustainability of Libraries;2021

3. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis;Library Hi Tech;2018-05-08

4. Intellectual Property Challenges in Digital Library Environments;Advances in Library and Information Science;2018

5. Introduction to digital libraries;Discover Digital Libraries;2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3