Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the impact of the mandatory adoption of (International Financial Reporting Standards [IFRS] 9) on loan provisions, nonperforming loans (NPL) and impairment loan loss in Gulf banks. This study also investigates potential variations in outcomes compared to prior models and explores the use of the Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) estimator for difference-in-differences (DiD) with multiple time periods.
Design/methodology/approach
The research is based on a sample of 53 Gulf banks covering the period from 2012 to 2020. The study analyzes the changes in loan provisions, impairment loss and NPL following the implementation of IFRS 9. It uses statistical analysis and the DiD method to compare the outcomes between the experimental group (treated by IFRS 9) and the control group (not treated).
Findings
The findings reveal a statistically insignificant increase in loan provisions, impairment loss and NPL after the adoption of IFRS 9. These results align with previous studies and suggest that Gulf banks were proactive in anticipating and mitigating the impact of the new standard. The study also observes a synchronization of provisioning practices across Gulf countries and a certain level of consistency in recognizing loan losses.
Practical implications
The practical implications of this study suggest that Gulf banks have successfully absorbed the impact of IFRS 9 and have implemented collaborative approaches.
Originality/value
The study offers some new sight into IFRS9 outcomes in developing countries and opens the door for implementing a novel DiD estimation in future research studies.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference54 articles.
1. The new accounting standard IFRS 9 and its impact on how banks should provision for credit losses,2019
2. A comparison study between IFRS 9 and IAS 39 in GCC countries;European Journal of Business and Management Research,2022
3. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations;The Review of Economic Studies,1991
4. How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?;Journal of Financial Economics,2022
5. Accounting treatment of credit loss allowances amid COVID-19: current expected credit loss (CECL) versus IFRS 9 expected credit loss (ECL);Journal of Applied Research in the Digital Economy (JADE),2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献